评价网 > 科教论文 > 文学毕业论文 > 新闻传播论文 > 正文

剖析传播学术中的“欧洲中心主义”——亚洲中(2)

2013-07-09 01:11

[]
Alatas, S. F. (2002). Eurocentrism and the role of the human sciences in the dialogue among civilizations. The European Legacy, 7(6), 759-770.
Alatas, S. F. (2006). Alternative discourses in Asian social science: Responses to Eurocentrism. New Delhi, India: Sage.
Asante, M. K. (1998). The Afrocentric idea (Rev. ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
Asante, M. K. (1999). The painful demise of Eurocentrism: An Afrocentric response to critics. Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press.
Asante, M. K. (2006). Afrocentricity and the Eurocentric hegemony of knowledge: Contradictions of place. In J. Young & J. E. Braziel (Eds.), Race and foundations of knowledge: Cultural amnesia in the academy (pp. 145-153). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Asante, M. K. (2007a). An Afrocentric manifesto: Toward an African renaissance. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Asante, M. K. (2007b). Communicating Africa: Enabling centricity for intercultural engagement. China Media Research, 3(3), 70-75.
Asante, M. K. (2008). The ideological significance of Afrocentricity in intercultural communication. In M. K. Asante, Y. Miike, & J. Yin (Eds.), The global intercultural communication reader (pp. 47-55). New York: Routledge.
Banerjee, I. (2009). Asian media studies: The struggle for international legitimacy. In D. K. Thussu (Ed.), Internationalizing media studies (pp. 165-174). London: Routledge.
Chen, G.-M. (2002). Problems and prospects of Chinese communication study. In W. Jia, X. Lu, & D. R. Heisey (Eds.), Chinese communication theory and research: Reflections, new frontiers, and new directions (pp. 255-268). Westport, CT: Ablex.
Chen, G.-M. (Ed.). (2004a). Theories and principles of Chinese communication (in Chinese). Taipei, Taiwan: Wunan.
Chen, G.-M. (2004b). The two faces of Chinese communication. Human Communication: A Journal of the Pacific and Asian Communication Association, 7(1), 25-36.
Chen, G.-M. (2006). Asian communication studies: What and where to now. Review of Communication, 6(4), 295-311.

Chen, G.-M. (2008). Toward transcultural understanding: A harmony theory of Chinese communication. China Media Research, 4(4), 1-13.
Chen, G.-M. (2009). Toward an I Ching model of communication. China Media Research, 5(3), 72-81.
Chen, G.-M., & Miike, Y. (Eds.). (2003). Asian approaches to human communication [Special issue]. Intercultural Communication Studies, 12(4), 1-218.
Chen, G.-M., & Miike, Y. (2008). The ferment and future of communication studies in Asia: Chinese and Japanese perspectives (in Chinese, J. Z. Edmondson, Trans.). In J. Z. Edmondson (Ed.), Asiacentric theories of communication (pp. 62-86). Hangzhou, China: Zhejiang University Press.
Chen, G.-M., & Starosta, W. J. (2003). Asian approaches to human communication: A dialogue. Intercultural Communication Studies, 12(4), 1-15.
Chesebro, J. W. (1996, December). Unity in diversity: Multiculturalism, guilt/victimage, and a new scholarly orientation. Spectra: Newsletter of the Speech Communication Association, 32(12), 10-14.
Chesebro, J. W., Kim, J. K., & Lee, D. (2007). Strategic transformations in power and the nature of international communication theory. China Media Research, 3(3), 1-13.
Chu, L. L. (1988). In search of an Oriental communication perspective. In Christian Academy (Ed.), The world community in post-industrial society: Vol. 2. Continuity and change in communications in post-industrial society (pp. 2-14). Seoul, South Korea: Wooseok.
Chung, J., & Ho, M. (2009). Public relations, I-Ching, and chi (qi/ki) theory: A new model from an old philosophy. China Media Research, 5(3), 94-101.
Chung, W., Jeong, J., Chung W., & Park, N. (2005). Comparison of current communication research status in the United States and Korea. Review of Communication, 5(1), 36-48.
Craig, R. T. (1999). Communication theory as a field. Communication Theory, 9(2), 119-161.
Craig, R. T., & Muller, H. L. (Eds.). (2007). Theorizing communication: Readings across traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dissanayake, W. (Ed.). (1988). Communication theory: The Asian perspective. Singapore: Asian Mass Communication Research and Information Center.
Dissanayake, W. (2007). Re-privileging Asian cultural concepts: Reflections on Edwin Thumboo’s poetry. In E. Thumboo (Eds.), Writing Asia: The literatures in Englishes (Vol. 1, pp. 214-226). Singapore: Ethos Books.
Dissanayake, W. (2009). The desire to excavate Asian theories of communication: One strand of the history. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 4(1), 7-27.
Edmondson, J. Z. (Ed.). (2008). Asiacentric theories of communication (in Chinese). Hangzhou, China: Zhejiang University Press.
Edmondson, J. Z. (2009). Testing the water at the crossing of post-modern, post-American and fu-bian flows: On the Asiacentric school in international communication theories. China Media Research, 5(1), 104-112.
Goonasekera, A. (1995). Communication studies and contemporary societies in Asia. Media Development, 42(2), 21-24.
Goonasekera, A., & Kuo, E. C. Y. (Eds.). (2000). Towards an Asian theory of communication? [Special issue]. Asian Journal of Communication, 10(2), 1-123.
Gordon, R. D. (2006). Communication, dialogue, and transformation. Human Communication: A Journal of the Pacific and Asian Communication Association, 9(1), 17-30.
Gordon, R. D. (2007a). Beyond the failures of Western communication theory. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 2(2), 89-107.
Gordon, R. D. (2007b). The Asian communication scholar for the 21st century. China Media Research, 3(4), 50-59.
Gunaratne, S. A. (2008). Falsifying two Asian paradigms and de-Westernizing science. Communication, Culture and Critique, 1(1), 72-85.
Gunaratne, S. A. (2009). Globalization: A non-Western perspective—The bias of social science/communication oligopoly. Communication, Culture and Critique, 2(1), 60-82.
Holmes, P. (2008). Foregrounding harmony: Chinese international students’ voices in communication with their New Zealand peers. China Media Research, 4(4), 102-110.
Ishii, S. (2008a). Human-to-human, human-to-nature, human-to-supernature intercultural communication: Toward developing new fields of scholarship (in Japanese). Intercultural Communication Review, 6, 9-17.

大学排名

Ishii, S. (2008b). Promoting interreligious communication studies: A rising rationale. Human Communication: A Journal of the Pacific and Asian Communication Association, 11(2), 133-144.
Ishii, S. (2009). Conceptualizing Asian communication ethics: A Buddhist perspective. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 4(1), 49-60.
Jackson, R. L. (2002). Exploring African American identity negotiation in the academy: Toward a transformative vision of African American communication scholarship. Howard Journal of Communications, 13(1), 43-57.
Jackson, R. L. (2003). Afrocentricity as metatheory: A dialogic exploration of its principles. In R. L. Jackson & E. B. Richardson (Eds.), Understanding African American rhetoric: Classical origins to contemporary innovations (pp. 115-129). New York: Routledge.
Jung, H. Y. (1995). The tao of transversality as a global approach to truth: A metacommentary on Calvin O. Schrag. Man and World: An International Philosophical Review, 28(1), 11-31.
Jung, H. Y. (2004). The ethics of transversal communication. Asian Communication Research, 1(2), 5-21.
Jung, H. Y. (2006). Transversality and comparative culture. Ex/Change: Newsletter of the Center for Cross-Cultural Studies at the City University of Hong Kong, 16, 11-17.
Jung, H. Y. (2009). Transversality and public philosophy in the age of globalization. In J. Y. Park (Ed.), Comparative political theory and cross-cultural philosophy: Essays in honor of Hwa Yol Jung (pp. 19-54). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Karenga, M. (2002). Introduction to Black Studies (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: University of Sankore Press.
Karenga, M. (2008). Molefi Kete Asante and the Afrocentric initiative: Mapping the terrain of his intellectual impact. In A. Mazama (Ed.), Essays in honor of an intellectual warrior, Molefi Kete Asante (pp. 17-49). Paris, France: Editions Menaibuc.
Kim, M.-S. (2002). Non-Western perspectives on human communication: Implications for theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Kincaid, D. L. (Ed.). (1987). Communication theory: Eastern and Western perspectives. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

（科教作文网http://zw.ΝsΕac.cOM编辑）

Kosaka, T. (2008). The use of metaphors in Zen rhetoric. Speech Communication Education: A Journal of the Communication Association of Japan, 21, 55-67.
Lee, P. S. N. (2008). The challenges of communication education in Asia. In I. Banerjee & S. Logan (Eds.), Asian communication handbook 2008 (pp. 58-66). Singapore: Asian Media Information and Communication Center.
Mataragnon, R. H. (1988). Pakikiramdam in Filipino social interaction: A study of subtlety and sensitivity. In A. C. Paranjpe, D. Y. F. Ho, & R. W. Rieber (Eds.), Asian contributions to psychology (pp. 251-262). New York: Praeger.
Mendoza, S. L. (2004). Pahiwatig: The role of “ambiguity” in Filipino American communication patterns. In M. Fong & R. Chuang (Eds.), Communicating ethnic and cultural identity (pp. 151-164). New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
Miike, Y. (2006). Non-Western theory in Western research? An Asiacentric agenda for Asian communication studies. Review of Communication, 6(1/2), 4-31.
Miike, Y. (2007a). An Asiacentric reflection on Eurocentric bias in communication theory. Communication Monographs, 74(2), 272-278.
Miike, Y. (2007b). Asian contributions to communication theory: An introduction. China Media Research, 3(4), 1-6.
Miike, Y. (2007c). Theorizing culture and communication in the Asian context: An assumptive foundation (in Chinese, J. Z. Edmondson, Trans.). In J. Z. Edmondson (Ed.), Selected international papers in intercultural communication (pp. 137-157). Hangzhou, China: Zhejiang University Press.
Miike, Y. (2008a). Advancing centricity for non-Western scholarship: Lessons from Molefi Kete Asante’s legacy of Afrocentricity. In A. Mazama (Ed.), Essays in honor of an intellectual warrior, Molefi Kete Asante (pp. 287-327). Paris, France: Editions Menaibuc.
Miike, Y. (2008b). Rethinking humanity, culture, and communication: Asiacentric critiques and contributions (in Chinese, J. Z. Edmondson, Trans.). In J. Z. Edmondson (Ed.), Asiacentric theories of communication (pp. 21-43). Hangzhou, China: Zhejiang University Press. 您可以访问中国科教评价网（www.NsEac.com）查看更多相关的文章。
Miike, Y. (2008c). Toward an alternative metatheory of human communication: An Asiacentric vision. In M. K. Asante, Y. Miike, & J. Yin (Eds.), The global intercultural communication reader (pp. 57-72). New York: Routledge.
Miike, Y. (2009a). “Cherishing the old to know the new”: A bibliography of Asian communication studies. China Media Research, 5(1), 95-103.
Miike, Y. (2009b). “Harmony without uniformity”: An Asiacentric worldview and its communicative implications. In L. A. Samovar, R. E. Porter, & E. R. McDaniel (Eds.), Intercultural communication: A reader (12th ed., pp. 36-48). Boston, MA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Miike, Y. (Ed.). (2009c). New frontiers in Asian communication theory [Special issue]. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 4(1), 1-88.
Miike, Y. (2010). Culture as text and culture as theory: Asiacentricity and its raison d’être in intercultural communication research. In R. T. Halualani & T. K. Nakayama (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of critical intercultural communication. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Miike, Y. (in press-a). Asiacentricity. In R. L. Jackson (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of identity. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Miike, Y. (in press-b). Enryo-sasshi theory. In R. L. Jackson (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of identity. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Miike, Y., & Chen, G.-M. (2006). Perspectives on Asian cultures and communication: An updated bibliography. China Media Research, 2(1), 98-106.
Miike, Y., & Chen, G.-M. (Eds.). (2007). Asian contributions to communication theory [Special issue]. China Media Research, 3(4), 1-109.
Miyahara, A. (2004). Toward theorizing Japanese interpersonal communication competence from a non-Western perspective. In F. E. Jandt (Ed.), Intercultural communication: A global reader (pp. 279-292). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Ngũgĩ, T. (1993). Moving the center: The struggle for cultural freedoms. Oxford, UK: James Currey.
Palencia-Roth, M. (2006). Universalism and transversalism: Dialogue and dialogics in a global perspective. In UNESCO (Ed.), Cultural diversity and transversal values: East-West dialogue on spiritual and secular dynamics (pp. 38-49). Paris, France: UNESCO. 大学排名
Paredes-Canilao, N. (2006). Decolonizing subjects from the discourse of difference. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 1(1), 6-26.
Rogers, E. M. (1982). The empirical and critical schools of communication research. In M. Burgoon (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 5, pp. 125-144). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
Rogers, E. M. (1999). Anatomy of the two subdisciplines of communication study. Human Communication Research, 25(4), 618-631.
Shi-xu. (2008). Towards a Chinese-discourse-studies approach to Cultural China: An epilogue. In D. Wu (Ed.), Discourses of Cultural China in the globalizing age (pp. 243-253). Hong Kong, China: Hong Kong University Press.
Shi-xu. (2009). Reconstructing Eastern paradigms of discourse studies. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 4(1), 29-48.
Starosta, W. J. (2006). Rhetoric and culture: An integrative view. China Media Research, 2(4), 65-74.
Storz, M. L. (1999). Malay and Chinese values underlying the Malaysian business culture. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 23(1), 117-131.
Tanno, D. V. (1992). The moral force of knowledge: A case for an emergent view of intercultural communication research. In J. A. Jaksa (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2nd National Communication Ethics Conference (pp. 83-89). Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.
Tanno, D. V. (2008). Ethical implications of the ethnic “text” in multicultural communication studies. In M. K. Asante, Y. Miike, & J. Yin (Eds.), The global intercultural communication reader (pp. 27-36). New York: Routledge.
Thayer, L. (1997). Pieces: Toward a revisioning of communication/life. Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
Tu, W. (1992). Core values and the possibility of a fiduciary global community. In K. Tehranian & M. Tehranian (Eds.), Restructuring for world peace: On the threshold of the twenty-first century (pp. 333-345). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Tu, W. (1997). Humanity as embodied love: Exploring filial piety in a global ethical perspective. In L. S. Rouner (Ed.), Is there a human nature? (pp. 172-181). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

（转载自中国科教评价网www.nseac.com ）

Tu, W. (2001). The global significance of local knowledge: A new perspective on Confucian humanism. Sungkyun Journal of East Asian Studies, 1(1), 22-27.
Tu, W. (2007). Dialogue among civilizations: A study of the modern transformation of Confucian humanism (in Korean and in English, S. Na, Trans.). Seoul, South Korea: Chunho Jeon.
Tu, W. (2008). Mutual learning as an agenda for social development. In M. K. Asante, Y. Miike, & J. Yin (Eds.), The global intercultural communication reader (pp. 329-333). New York: Routledge.
Wallerstein, I. (1997). Eurocentrism and its avatars: The dilemmas of social science. New Left Review, 226, 93-107.
Wallerstein, I. (2006). European universalism: The rhetoric of power. New York: New Press.
Wang, G., & Shen, V. (2000). East, West, communication, and theory: Searching for the meaning of searching for Asian communication theories. Asian Journal of Communication, 10(2), 14-32.
West, R., & Turner, L. H. (2010). Introducing communication theory: Analysis and application (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Xiao, X., & Chen, G.-M. (2009). Communication competence and moral competence: A Confucian perspective. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 4(1), 61-74.
Yin, J. (2006). Toward a Confucian feminism: A critique of Eurocentric feminist discourse. China Media Research, 2(3), 9-18.
Yin, J. (2009). Negotiating the center: Towards an Asiacentric feminist communication theory. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 4(1), 75-88.