论文首页哲学论文经济论文法学论文教育论文文学论文历史论文理学论文工学论文医学论文管理论文艺术论文 |
摘要:本文以案例的形式展现和分析了当前新课程背景下高中英语课堂教学中导入环节存在的突出问题,并有针对性地提出了解决问题的对策与方案。
关键词:高中英语;导入;问题;对策
Abstract: This paper posits and analyzes two characteristic scenarios, indicative of the major problems in preparation and implementation of ……
Ss:(没反应)
T:(问一学生) Where are you going?
S:(犹豫地站起来) Maybe.... I don’t know.
T:Now please discuss in groups of four to make a plan for your National Day trip by answering the six questions. (打出幻灯片:Where are you going? Where are you staying? How are you going to...? How long are you staying in...? When are you arriving in/at...? When are you coming back?).
Ss:(很不情愿地开始讨论)。
3.3 问题剖析与对策探讨:
从以上这个案例中我们感受到学生的兴趣仍然游离在教师所创设的情境之外,是明显的“导”而不“入”的现象。学生对教师预设的问题“What will you do on National Day?”的回答是“Stay at home.”,而教师还接着抛出第二个预设的问题“If you plan to spend your holiday somewhere else, where are you going?”。 明显地,学生没有出去游玩的兴致,而教师却要根据自己预设好的问题继续教学程序,直接导致教师一厢情愿的教学局面,致使“导”而不“入”。
其实,教师应深入了解学生的学习、工作和生活,把握学生的兴趣点,找准话题,使学生有话想说,有话能说。应该说旅游对现在的学生来说不再是一种可望而不可及的活动。与其说他们奢望旅游,不如说他们更奢望休息,睡到自然醒和通过网络的方式休闲一把。基于这一考虑,笔者对旅游的话题稍做了一点别致的设计,抓住学生的好奇心,让学生尝试了解老师的国庆安排 :“Guess where I am going without asking ‘Where are you going?’or ‘Are you going to...?’”虽然,话题相同,但效果截然不同,学生个个跃跃欲试,有问“How are you going there?”的,有问“Who are you going together with?”的,也有问“How long are you staying there?”的。教师对学生的问题逐一给予回答,可还是没有学生能猜对,因为“I am staying at home and playing computer games.”的结果是出乎学生预料的。这时,学生兴奋到了极点。教师抓住这一时机告诉学生 :“In fact, it is not good for us to stay at home, playing computer games all day long. It will make you a computer potato. Why not go out into the wild and plan for your trip now?”。于是让学生开始小组谈论设计自己的出行计划“Discuss in groups of four to make a plan for your National Day travel”。小组活动后,让组长汇报讨论结果“What have you considered about your travel plan?”。当组长汇报说“Where are we going?”时,教师板书“destination”;当组长汇报“How are we getting there?”时,教师板书“transportation”。
共2页: 1
论文出处(作者):