践言冲突方法与哲学范式的重新奠基(5)

　　[③] J. R. Searle, How Performatives Work. Linguistics and Philosophy vol. 12, no. 5 (1989), pp. 535-558.

　　[④] 克里斯特尔编：《现代语言学词典》，沈家煊译，商务印书馆，2000年版，第79、262页。

　　[⑤] D. Robinson, Introducing Performative Pragmatics. London: Routledge, 2006, p. 14.

　　[⑥] J. L. Austin, Philosophical Papers. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979, p. 189；参见B. Smith, John Searle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003, p.6.

　　[⑦] E. LePore and R. V. Gulick, John Searle and His Critics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1991, p. 94.

　　[⑧] E. LePore and R. V. Gulick, John Searle and His Critics. p. 19。参见哈贝马斯：《交往行为理论》第1卷，曹卫东译，上海人民出版社，2004年版，第262页。

　　[⑨] 另外两个原因是：（1）在哲学译名中，constative被广泛地译为“断言（的）”，其特征是有所断定而具有真值；这样“践言”与“断言”词义相对而构词相仿，似乎较为合适；（2）施行冲突或施行矛盾都会构成动宾词组，容易产生误解。

　　[⑩] J. Hintikka, Cogito, Ergo Quis Est. Revue Internationale De Philosophie, vol. 50, no. 195 (1996), pp. 5-21.

　　[11] J. Hintikka, Cogito, Ergo Sum: Inference or Performance? The Philosophical Review, vol. 71, no. 1 (1962), pp. 3-32.

　　[12] J. Hintikka, Cogito, Ergo Sum: Inference or Performance? p. 6；参见：J. Hintikka, Existential Presuppositions and Existential Commitments. The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 56, no. 3 (1959), pp. 125-137.

　　[13] J. Hintikka, Cogito, Ergo Sum: Inference or Performance? p. 12.

　　[14] J. Hintikka, Cogito, Ergo Sum as an Inference and a Performance. The Philosophical Review, vol. 72, no. 4 (1963), p. 489.

　　[15] R. Auxier and L. E. Hahn (ed.), The Philosophy of Jaakko Hintikka. Chicago: Open Court, 2006, p. 339.

　　[16] K.-O. Apel, Understanding and Explanation. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1984, p. 275.

　　[17] H. Albert, Treatise on Critical Reason. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985, pp. 18-19, 72.

　　[18] K. Baynes, et al (ed.) After Philosophy: End or Transformation? Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1987, pp. 259-260, 265-267.

　　[19] J. Habermas, Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1990, p. 80.

　　[20] 不过，哈贝马斯的去先验性主张与阿佩尔的先验性要求都试图基于语言的交往行为改造康德式的先验性，在一定意义上是可以殊途同归的。参见：J. Habermas, Truth and Justification. Cambridge: Polity, 2003, Chapter 2 & 4。

　　[21] 哈贝马斯：《交往行为理论》第1卷，第266、273页。

　　[22] J. Habermas, The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures. Cambridge: Polity,  1990, p. xiii.