论共犯证言之效力律毕业论文

摘   要

在刑诉诉讼法中，犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的供述和辩解是属于刑诉证据之1，共犯证言具有犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的供述和辩解的特征，在刑诉诉讼法中共犯证言也属于刑诉证据。共同犯罪嫌疑人、被告人在犯罪行为败露后，商讨对策、互相包庇，互相抵赖，甚至达成诉讼利益与责任上的违法交易。如何对待共犯证言之效力是司法实践中常遇到的问题，共同犯罪的犯罪嫌疑人、被告人能否互为证人，在只有共犯证言的情况下能否定案，不仅关系到对被告人的定罪，而且关系到如何保证司法公正。故本文就此问题进行探讨，认为共犯证言不同于证人证言，共同犯罪被告人的供述不具有完全的证据能力，不能相互补强据以定案。进而提出了完善我国共犯证言效力的建议：借鉴国外关于共犯证言需要补强证据的做法，在考虑我国的证据法时规定共犯口供需要补强证据的规则。
关键词：刑事诉讼 共犯证言 效力

ABSTRACT

In criminal procedure law, criminal suspects, the accuseds testimony and defense is one of the Criminal Suit evidence, accomplice testimony of criminal suspects, the accuseds testimony and defend the characteristics in criminal procedural law which belong to the testimony of an accomplice Criminal Suit evidence. Common criminal suspects and defendants in criminal acts after exposure to discuss countermeasures, and mutual protection and irrefutable. even reached the proceedings and responsibilities of illegal transactions. How to deal with the accomplice testimony of the effectiveness of judicial practice often encounter problems, the common crime of criminal suspects, Can accused each other witnesses, only the testimony of an accomplice ability finalized, is not only related to the conviction of the accused, relations but also on how to ensure justice. So, we explore this issue that is different from the testimony of an accomplice witness testimony, joint criminal defendants testimony is not complete evidence, it was not mutual reinforcement to finalize. Thereby improving the effectiveness of the accomplice testimony : foreign accomplice testimony on the need for reinforcing the evidence, In considering our countrys Evidence Act to require the complicity of statements need reinforcement of rules of evidence. （科教作文网http://zw.NSEaC.com编辑发布）
Keyword: Criminal  Accomplice testimony  Effect
..............................
注：【包括：毕业，任务书，开题报告】