论文首页哲学论文经济论文法学论文教育论文文学论文历史论文理学论文工学论文医学论文管理论文艺术论文 |
摘 要
面对侵占罪案件增多,社会危害性增大的现实问题,我国刑法增设了侵占罪以弥补刑事立法之不足。但是由于法律未对本罪的内涵和外延作明确的界定,因而学界对此罪的认识见仁见智,致使司法实务陷入了困境。因此,有必要就无因管理、不当得利之物是否可作为犯罪对象,遗忘物与遗失物是否应当加以区分以及本罪是否存在公诉形式等问题来探讨,希望可以更好地指导司法实践。
关键字:侵占罪 犯罪对象 诉讼形式
Abstract
Facing the realistic problem of the misappropriation case and the social hazardous increased, our country’s criminal law has added the crime of misappropriation to make up the defects of criminal legislation. But because the law don’t detail connotation and extension of the crime, thus the academic have different views. And then caused the judicial action fall into predicament. Therefore it is necessary to solve the problem that whether the voluntary service object and the unjust enrichment object can qua the crime object; and whether the forgetful property and the lost property need been distinguished; whether exists public prosecution and so on. Via discuss those problems, we will have better theoretical guide in judicial practice.
Key words: Crime of misappropriation Object of crime Lawsuit form
注:【包括:毕业、开题报告、任务书】
......................................