论牵连犯的定罪与处罚律毕业论文

摘  要

我国刑法理论界对牵连犯的定义各异。牵连犯，应该是指行为人出于1个最终的犯罪目的实施了数个犯罪行为（目的行为、方法行为或结果行为）而分别触犯不同罪名的犯罪形态。牵连犯概念本身体现了两大基本问题：1是牵连犯自身标准模糊不清，2是从1重处断原则矛盾重重。判断牵连关系应坚持主客观相统1原则，对牵连犯的定罪要与其相关犯罪形态加以界分；对牵连犯的处罚，应坚持从1重重处罚原则。牵连犯的定罪与处罚问题研究，对于完善刑法理论中数罪形态具有1定的理论指导意义和司法实践价值。

关键词：牵连犯；定罪原则；牵连关系；处罚原则
 

Abstract

Toward the concept of implicated offense schools have a great dispute in our criminal theories. An implicated offense is committed when a perpetrator practices more than one criminal acts( objective act, methodological act or consequential act) for one purpose and each act constitutes a different crime, respectively. The concept of implicated offense itself , embody two basic problems: one is implicated offense itself standard blurred, the other is the principle of “choice of the most serious offense and the most severe punishment” contradiction heavily. To decide whether acts commitled have an implicated relationship, we should consider both subjective and objective factors, and implicated offense’s criminate must be joined to correlation commit a crime form and differentiate them; to punish the implicated offense, we should apply a principle of “choice of the most serious offense and severer punishment”. It’s fixed theory guide meaning and administration of justice practice value how to research the problem of implicated offender’s criminate and implicated offender’s punish, as for making perfect criminal theory many criminal form possess.

Key Words：implicated offense；criminate principle；implicated relationship；punish principle （科教作文网http://zw.nseAc.com）
 ..............................
注：【包括：毕业，任务书，开题报告】