论文首页哲学论文经济论文法学论文教育论文文学论文历史论文理学论文工学论文医学论文管理论文艺术论文 |
摘 要
鉴定人作为司法鉴定活动的具体实施主体,应当出庭接受质证,这是由其特殊的诉讼地位以及鉴定结论对于案件审判结果的决定性作用所决定的,但在我国司法实践中,鉴定人就其鉴定结论出庭接受质证的却极少,究其原因既有立法制度上的不完善,也有鉴定人自身的主观原因,鉴定人不出庭作证将直接影响诉讼程序的公正,当事人的合法权益。借鉴国外相关规定,结合我国的具体情况,可以从明确鉴定人出庭作证的义务,完善鉴定人出庭作证的人身安全保障制度及经济补偿制度等方面着手,重新构建1套有利于我国鉴定人制度良性发展的制度设计。
关键词:鉴定人;鉴定结论;出庭作证;立法建议
ABSTRACT
As the main body of the appraisal,appraiser must appear to wittness in court , its because of their unusural function in the judicature as well as the decided funtion of the appraisal result to the cases result. But in our country, appraisers are always not to appear in court on their writtings to answer the questions in the indicature practice. The reasons are what the legislation is not to be perfect and also the appraisers are not to appear in the court. But the appraisers absence would affect the fair procedure directly and the legitimate rights of the litigants. Profiting by the corrlation stipulation of the oversea, and on the special detialls of our country, we can develop the system design which is good for the system of the appraiser again, by clearing about the appraisers duty and consuming the system of the personal safety protection and the economy compensates.
Key words:Appraiser ;Appraisal result: Witness in court;Legislative suggestions (转载自http://www.NSEAC.com中国科教评价网)
..............................
注:【包括:毕业,任务书,开题报告】