评价网 > 科教论文 > 哲学毕业论文 > 哲学论文 > 正文

;[摘要];符号学已经成为意识形态批判的基本方法(6)

2013-05-24 01:22

;[注释];
;
;①将le;langage译成“群体语言”，la;langue译成“整体语言”，la;parole译成“个体语言”的诸般理由，可参见拙文《学术的进展和译名的重定》[14](pp.82-194)。;
;②详细阐述参见拙文《索绪尔“符号学”设想的缘起与意图》，《浙江大学学报》（人文社会科学版）2005年第4期。;
;③叶尔姆斯列夫所谓的形式，指某种表现形式中的常数、不变者。参见[7]（P12，p50）;
;④这里指含蓄意指之能指。但在叶尔姆斯列夫及罗兰•巴特其他论述中，含蓄意指者或指含蓄意指的能指，或指含蓄意指的所指，或两者兼指。;
;
;[参考文献];
;
;[1];Saussure,;F.;d.;Écrits;de;linguistique;générale[C].;Texte;établi;et;édité;par;Simon;Bouquet;et;Rudolf;Engler.;
;Paris:;Gallimard,;2002.;
;[2];Hjelmslev,;L;.;Essais;linguistiques[C].;Paris:;Minuit,;1971.;
;[3];索绪尔.《普通语言学教程》[M].;高名凯译.;北京:;商务印书馆,;1980.;
;[4];索绪尔.《索绪尔第三次普通语言学教程》[M].;屠友祥译.;上海:;上海人民出版社,;2002.;
;[5];Barthes,;R.;Eléments;de;sémiologie[M],;dans;le;Œuvres;Complètes[M].;T.Ⅰ.;Paris:;Seuil,;1993.;
;[6];Saussure,;F.;d.;Deuxieme;Cours;de;linguistique;générale(1908-1909);d’après;les;cahiers;d’Albert;Riedlinger;et;
;Charles;Patois[M].;Texte;établi;par;Eisuke;Komatsu.;Oxford:;Pergamon,;1997.;
;[7];Hjelmslev,;L;.;Prolegomena;to;a;Theory;of;Language[M].;tr.;F.;J.;Whitfield.;Madison:;University;of;Wisconsin;Press,;1961.;
;[8];Barthes,;R.;"Présentation"[A],;dans;le;Œuvres;Complètes[M].;T.Ⅰ.;Paris:;Seuil,;1993.;
;[9];Barthes,;R.;"Introduction;à;l’analyse;structurale;des;récits";[A],;dans;le;Œuvres;Complètes[M].;T.Ⅱ.;Paris:;Seuil,;1994.;
;[10];兹维坦•托多罗夫.;《从<十日谈>看叙事作品语法》[A].;黄建民译.;收于《叙述学研究》[M].;张寅德编.;北京:;中国社会科学出版社,;1989.; （科教作文网http://zw.ΝsΕAc.com发布）
;[11];罗兰•巴特.;《S/Z》[M].;屠友祥译.;上海:;上海人民出版社,;2000.;
;[12];Barthes,;R.;"Proust;et;les;noms";[A],;dans;le;Œuvres;Complètes[M].;T.Ⅱ.;Paris:;Seuil,;1994.;
;[13];Barthes,;R.;"Les;suites;d’actions";[A],;dans;le;Œuvres;Complètes[M].;T.Ⅱ.;Paris:;Seuil,;1994.;
;[14];罗兰•巴特.;《文之悦》[M].;屠友祥译.;上海:;上海人民出版社,;2002.;
;[15];Barthes,;R.;Roland;Barthes;par;Roland;Barthes[M].;Paris:;Seuil,;1975.;
;[16];Barthes,;R.;"Flaubert;et;la;phrase"[A],;dans;le;Œuvres;Complètes[M].;T.Ⅱ.;Paris:;Seuil,;1994.;
;[17

：科教论文网毕业论文论文网

　　];Saussure,;F.;d.Cours;de;linguistique;générale.;Premier(pp.11-176);et;troisième(pp.181-368);cours;d’après;les;
;notes;de;Riedlinger;et;Constantin[M].;Texte;établi;par;Eisuke;Komatsu.;Tokyo:;Université;Gakushuin,;1993.;
;[18];Calvet,;L.;J.;Roland;Barthes[M].;Paris:;Flammarion,;1990.;
;[19];Barthes,;R.;"La;mythologie;aujourd’hui"[A],;dans;le;Œuvres;Complètes[M].;T.Ⅱ.;Paris:;Seuil,;1994.;
;[20];Barthes,;R.;Mythologies[M].;Paris:;Seuil,;1957.;
;[21];Barthes,;R.;"Rhétorique;de;l’image"[A],;dans;le;L’obvie;et;l’obtus;[M].;Paris:;Seuil,;1982.;
;[22];Barthes,;R.;"Le;classement;structural;des;figures;de;rhétorique"[A],;dans;le;Œuvres;Complètes[M].;T.Ⅱ.;Paris:;Seuil,;1994.;
;[23];Barthes,;R.;"L’ancienne;rhétorique.;Aide-mémoire"[A],;dans;le;Œuvres;Complètes[M].;T.Ⅱ.;Paris:;Seuil,;1994.;
;
;Saussure;and;Roland;Barthes:;
;The;framework;of;the;mode;of;cultural;signification;analysis;
;Tu;You-Xiang;
;(Literature;College,;Henan;University,;Kaifeng;475001,;PRC);
;[Abstract];The;semiology;has;been;the;fundamental;method;of;the;ideological;criticism.;It;is;fit;for;semiological;mode;to;analyse;ideology,;because;the;social;collectivity;is;the;internal;character;of;the;semiology,;meanwhile;the;ideology;is;a;collective;conscience;and;representation,;a;mode;of;signification.;F.;d.;Saussure;distinguished;la;langue;and;la;parole;(sociality;/;individuality),;he;took;semiology;as;criterion;to;determine;that;la;langue;is;the;object;of;linguistic;study,;because;it;has;the;social;collectivity L.;Hjelmslev;substituted;schéma;/;usage;for;langue;/;parole,;he;thought;both;schéma;and;usage;have;sociality Roland;Barthes;depended;on;L.;Hjelmslev’s;theory;──;the;schéma;/;usage;of;the;language;govern;the;sign’s;structure,;operation;and;signification,;he;inverted;Saussure’s;declaration:;linguistics;is;a;part;of;semiology,;it;is;semiology;which;is;a;part;of;linguistics.;Thus,;he;applied;linguistics’;mode:;the;syntagmatic;order;and;the;paradigmatic;order,;to;analyse;all;the;fact;of;semiology,;the;phenomena;of;signification,;in;which;the;sentence;is;a;typically;syntagme.;The;sentence;is;complete;construction,;it;is;latent;power;of;accomplishment.;It;accords;with;the;ideology;which;has;the;character;of;repetition,;fixed;and;accomplishment therefore,;it;becomes;the;model,;channel;and;object;of;analysis;of;cultural;signification;and;ideology.;The;paradigmatic;order;is;the;class;of;connotation;units;(signifiers;or;signifieds).;The;denotation;denotes;verity;(language’s;verity),;and;transfers;itself;into;the;signifiers;or;the;signifieds;of;connotation,;in;other;words,;the;signifiers;or;the;signifieds;of;connotation;loads;the;denotation.;The;ideology;is;the;constant;of;the;signifieds;of;connotation,;which;realizes;the;verisimilitude;of;ideology;by;means;of;the;denotation.;The;rhetoric;is;the;constant;of;the;signifiers;of;connotation,;i.;e.;it;appears;as;the;signifying;aspect;of;ideology,;which;is;a;semantic;conversion,;deviation;and;deformation.;It;is;this;which;realizes;the;phantasm;of;ideology,;meanwhile,;unveils;the;phantasm;of;ideology.;So,;we;can;say;that;the;analysis;of;cultural;signification;is;essentially;the;research;of;ideology;and;rhetoric.;