身份犯的处罚根据论(6)
2017-10-08 02:41
导读：因此,该特殊身份的具备并未定定(对应犯罪所侵害的)法益是否存在。但是,该不纯正身份犯在处罚上又有别于相对应的犯罪,这种处罚上的不同源自于刑法所
因此,该特殊身份的具备并未定定(对应犯罪所侵害的)法益是否存在。但是,该不纯正身份犯在处罚上又有别于相对应的犯罪,这种处罚上的不同源自于刑法所保护的法益受到侵害程度之差异,回根到底是受行为主体的特定身份的影响。
参考文献:
[1] 杜国强.身份犯研究[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2005:27-41.
[2] 杨辉忠.身份犯研究[D].吉林大学博士学位论文,2006:88-92.
[3]大越义久.刑法解释之展开[M].东京:日本信山出版株式会社,1992:83.
[4]木村龟二.刑法学词典[M].顾肖荣,等,译.上海:上海翻译公司,1991:130-132.
[5]野村稔.刑法总论[M].全理其,何力,译.北京:法律出版社,2001:94.
[6] 陈朴生,洪福增.刑法总则[M].台北:五南图书出版公司,1982:270.
[7] 高铭暄.刑法学原理:第一卷[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1993:705-708;赵秉志.犯罪主体论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1989:291-293.
[8] 西田典之.新版共犯与身份[M].东京:成文堂,2003:138.
[9] 马克昌.比较刑法原理——外国刑法学总论[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2002:149.
[10] 大塚仁.注释刑法:第一编 总则[M].东京:青林书院,1978:122.
[11] 童伟华.犯罪构成原理 [M].北京:知识产权出版社,2006:197.
[12] 张明楷.法益初论[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2000:269-277;周光权.刑法学的向度[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2004:192-218.
Abstract:
Justification for punishing of shenfenfan (offense the perpetrator of which is required to have a special status) is of great importance to the study of the theories related to the offence and may immediately determine how to solve the problems arising out of or pertaining to the offense. Neither the failure瞭o瞗ulfill瞣bligation doctrine originating from the criminal law of continental law system nor the doctrine of violation of the interests and values protected by criminal law and the relevant comprehensive doctrine can adequately justify punishment of shenfenfan. Some arguments brought forward by Chinese scholars are also defective. In fact, punishment of shenfenfan should be justified based on the doctrine of violation of the interests and values related to status that are protected by criminal law.
（科教范文网http://fw.nseac.com） Key Words:shenfenfan; justification for punishment; interests and values related to status that are protected by criminal law
